Today in Middle Eastern history: the Battle of Marj Rahit (684)

The early caliphate was not an especially stable place. In the two centuries after Muhammad’s death in 632, the empire went through four fitnas, or civil wars. It’s fair to say that the second of these, which lasted from 680 to 692, was really almost a do over of the first, with the same factions (the Umayyads, loyalists of Ali and his family, and those who were neither of those things) having another go at sorting out early Islam’s political future.

Today is the anniversary of an early but critical battle in that war, 684’s Battle of Marj Rahit, which was fought near Damascus between the two dominant factions that had formed among the Arab tribes, the “northern” Qays and the “southern” Yaman (or Kalb). These were relatively recent factions, created as Arab fighters sorted themselves into social groups in their newly-conquered lands. Those groupings then projected their factional solidarity back into pre-Islamic Arabian society, which was ahistorical but gave the factions real social currency. The two groups developed their own tribal customs, dress, etc., and a major, often violent, rivalry developed between them.

It is absurdly difficult to find maps or other images that are relevant to this battle. This map shows a skirmish at Marj Rahit in 634, during the Arab invasion of the Byzantine Empire, but at least it shows you roughly where Marj Rahit was relative to Damascus. (via)

That rivalry turned violent after the death of Caliph Muʿawiyah I in 680. He was succeeded by his son, Yazid I (d. 683), and this raised eyebrows all over the empire. A hereditary monarchy was something most Arabs had resisted. Part of the extensive opposition to Ali becoming caliph was related to the fact that he was Muhammad’s son in-law and therefore he and his sons–Muhammad’s grandsons–could form a line of kings descended from the Prophet. This is why the Second Fitna looks so much like the First, because it was fought over the same basic cause. It’s just that in the Second Fitna the Umayyads were fighting for hereditary monarchy where they’d fought against it the first time around. The war started quickly, and later in 680 Yazid’s army met and destroyed a small army led by Ali’s son Husayn at Karbala, knocking that side out of the war and also inadvertently creating the defining historical event for Shiʿa Muslims.

The third group to get involved in the war, the non-aligned if you will, coalesced around a respected Medinan figure named Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr (d. 692, in case you’re wondering how the war is going to turn out). He was the son of a famous companion of Muhammad’s named, well, al-Zubayr (d. 656), who had fought against and been killed by Ali’s forces in the First Fitna. Ibn al-Zubayr fled Medina to Mecca and invited Husayn to make his capital there, but when Husayn was killed the people in Mecca up and declared Ibn al-Zubayr the rightful caliph. He subsequently won support from just about every corner of the empire outside of Syria, which was the Umayyads’ base. Yazid’s army responded by besieging Mecca, but Yazid himself died while that siege was going on. He was succeeded by his son, Muʿawiyah II, who stopped the siege and then, after only a few months at most on the throne, abdicated in favor of his grandfather’s cousin, Marwan I (d. 685).

Marwan had a big problem, which was that the Qays faction in Syria had decided that it would rather throw its support behind Ibn al-Zubayr than continue supporting the Umayyads. They believed Muʿawiyah had favored the Yamanis (Muʿawiyah marrying a Yamani woman didn’t help ease their concerns), and Marwan’s accession had quite explicitly been arranged by the leading Yamani tribes, which was the final straw as far as the Qays were concerned.

When the Umayyads refused to capitulate to Ibn al-Zubayr, the Syrian Qays, under the leadership of the governor of Damascus, al-Dahhak ibn Qays al-Fihri, decided to do something about it. The two tribal groups started skirmishing with one another in mid-July, but they didn’t meet in a pitched battle until August 18 at Marj Rahit. Details of the battle are sketchy at best, but obviously Marwan’s outnumbered (we think) forces won (possibly by bribing Qays-aligned tribes to switch sides), or else subsequent events would have looked a lot different.

Marj Rahit didn’t do anything about Ibn al-Zubayr, who was still in Mecca, but it did dramatically improve the Umayyads’ fortunes and allowed them to survive as a dynasty long enough to regain their strength. The victory allowed the Umayyads to consolidate Syria and then regain control of Egypt, putting Ibn al-Zubayr on the defensive and stuck in Arabia (Iraq was still heavily in the Ali-family camp and rejected both the Zubayrids and the Umayyads until Ibn al-Zubayr invaded and conquered it in 687). Marwan died in April 685, but he was succeeded by his very capable son, Abd al-Malik (d. 705), who would patch things up somewhat with the Syrian Qays, see the civil war to its end, and make great strides in turning the caliphate from a loose collection of localities (not to mention a seething mass of tribal rivalries) into a coherent empire.

Hi, how’s it going? Thanks for reading; attwiw wouldn’t exist without you! If you’ve enjoyed this or any other posts here, please share widely and help build our audience. You can follow this site (and like, share, etc. its content) on lots of social media outlets. I’m now accepting guest submissions, just email me. Most critically, if you’re a regular reader I hope you’ll read this and consider helping this place to stay alive.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.