Today in South Asian history: the Battle of Diu (1509)

The appearance of Portuguese explorers in India in 1498 was, it’s safe to say, a world-altering event. When Vasco da Gama proved that it was possible for European ocean-going vessels to reach India by going around Africa, it meant changes not only for Europe and India, but for the kingdoms in between, whose economies had depended to one extent or another on extracting rents from Europe-India commercial traffic. Here I’m talking about a number of Muslim states–the Ottomans, the Mamluks, the various dynasties that controlled northern India and Iran. But I’m also talking about Christian Venice, which made a good deal of bank ferrying eastern luxuries across the Mediterranean Sea to European customers.

The arrival of the Portuguese changed things for India too, let’s not minimize that. It took a while for the full effect to be felt, and by the time it was felt Britain had displaced Portugal, but obviously Indian history would look a lot different if the Europeans had never arrived. Their impact took a while to really manifest–the most powerful of the Muslim Indian kingdoms, the Mughal Empire, hadn’t even been established yet by 1509–but manifest it did.

I’m getting way ahead of the story though. The Portuguese arrival was not well-received in the ports of southwestern India, in cities like Calicut (look closely at the map below). Those areas were already pretty well-penetrated by Arab merchants, who had already driven off a Chinese attempt to establish commercial outposts there. Those merchants may have colluded to produce a similar fate for the Portuguese, or the Portuguese may have gotten dragged into local political disputes, or both, or something else altogether, but whatever the cause things broke very badly in late 1500. That year, Pedro Álvares Cabral, a Portuguese noble with apparently no seafaring experience, sailed a fleet into Calicut harbor where it, uh, sat, for months, waiting to buy enough spices and other goods to fill its ships for the return trip to Europe. In December, frustrated by what he saw as a concerted plot by Arab merchants to lock him out of the market, Cabral seized an Arab ship in the harbor and took its goods. In response, a mob organized by the port’s Arab merchants massacred at least 50 Portuguese people onshore.

With Calicut no longer friendly territory, the Portuguese reached out to the nearby state of Cochin, nominally a vassal of Calicut but ruled by a raja who wasn’t terribly happy with that arrangement. The Gujarat Sultanate, located in northwestern India and one of those trade intermediaries I talked about above, decided to throw in with Calicut as a way of hopefully getting rid of the Portuguese, and they sent to Cairo asking for help from the Mamluks–arguably the kingdom that had the most to lose from the establishment of a direct Europe-to-India trade route, since it controlled the main Red Sea route for Indian goods heading to Europe. On top of that, the Portuguese had begun to encroach on Mamluk territory, capturing the island of Socotra in the Arabian Sea (which today is part of Yemen).

The Mamluks and Venetians were already feeling the pinch as the Portuguese began bringing Indian goods back to Europe via the route around Africa, so they decided to Do Something about it (Doing Something, as you know, is always a good idea). Since the Mamluks, who specialized in mounted archery, weren’t particularly noted for their naval warfare capabilities, Venice provided several Mediterranean carracks and war galleys along with Greek crews. Venetian shipbuilders disassembled the vessels for the overland trip from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea, then reassembled them for the nearly two-year (they had things to do along the way and the monsoons didn’t cooperate) voyage to the port of Diu, in Gujarat. They arrived in late 1507.

Map - India - Eve of Mughal Invasion
India c. the early 1500s; you can see Diu marked in Gujarat (Gujerat, whatever)

The Portuguese fleet was outnumbered, but it likely outgunned its adversaries and certainly outclassed them in hand-to-hand combat. The Mamluks did have a few large vessels, but the bulk of their fleet was made up of tiny Indian dhows, which were generally too small for cannon. The Portuguese fleet included state-of-the-art carracks and caravels, ships that were built to withstand the rigors of long ocean travel and packed with cannon. When it came to ship-to-ship fighting the Mamluks brought archers, while the Portuguese soldiers were armed with gunpowder firearms and grenades. Despite this technological imbalance, however, at the Battle of Chaul in March 1508, the Mamluk/Gujarati fleet caught a small (maybe 8 ships and no carracks) Portuguese fleet by surprise and came away victorious. It was the first time the Portuguese had been defeated in the Indian Ocean.

It so happens that the Portuguese fleet at Chaul had been commanded by the son of the Portuguese viceroy in India, Francisco de Almeida, and he (the son) had been killed in the fighting. Francisco, as you might expect, was out for blood, and as he was due to be replaced as viceroy he had to move fast if he was going to get it. He sent a letter to Malik Ayyaz, the Gujarati governor of Diu, announcing his intentions:

“I the viceroy tell you, honored Meliqueaz, captain of Diu, that I come with my knights to your city, to spear the people who shelter there, after they attacked my people in Chaul, and they killed a man who was called my son; and I come with hope in God of Heaven to take revenge on them and those who help them; and if I do not find them I will take your city in payment, and you, for the help you gave them at Chaul. I tell you this so that you will know that I go, as I am now on this island of Bombay, as the bearer of this letter will tell you.”

The Mamluk fleet commander, Amir Hussain al-Kurdi, was aware of his fleet’s weakness, so he kept it in Diu’s harbor in a defensive position. This turned out to be a bad idea. Hussain’s decision to keep his ships lashed together as a defensive line in the harbor left them practically immobile, unable to react to what the Portuguese did. The geography of the harbor forced all those small dhows to bunch together, which made them sitting ducks for Portuguese cannon. The Portuguese fleet gradually boarded and seized the Mamluk carracks, and the Portuguese caravels were able to maneuver around the Mamluk line and bombard them from the rear.

The Mamluk-Gujarati losses at Diu were in the hundreds, compared to a couple dozen Portuguese killed. Almeida was offered the city, but he opted for a large cash payment instead, figuring it would be too hard to defend the city once he had it. He executed most of his prisoners, still mad about the death of his son at Chaul. He was replaced as viceroy later in the year, and was killed by an African tribe during the trip back to Portugal. The most important outcome of Diu was that it confirmed that the Portuguese were in India to stay, or at least until another European power drove them out. The Ottomans, who had defeated and subjugated the Mamluks by 1517, besieged the Portuguese fortress at Diu twice (in 1538 and 1547), but both of those sieges failed and the Ottomans pretty much wrote the Indian Ocean off after the second one.

Hi, how’s it going? Thanks for reading; attwiw wouldn’t exist without you! If you’ve enjoyed this or any other posts here, please share widely and help build our audience. You can like this site on Facebook or follow me on Twitter as well. Most critically, if you’re a regular reader I hope you’ll read this and consider helping this place to stay alive.

Author: DWD

writer, blogger, lover, fighter

3 thoughts

  1. I always thought it was the combination of the two. The Ottoman conquest got people thinking about alternative routes to the East, and the fact that the Portuguese had claimed the around-Africa route for themselves motivated Spain to try a different direction. At the time, some people actually thought the western route would be shorter than going around Africa, but the Portuguese weren’t buying it.

Leave a Reply