Today in European history: the Battle of Saint Gotthard (1664)

We’ve talked here in the past about the 1683 Siege of Vienna, where the Ottoman Empire saw its high water mark, and the subsequent 1699 Treaty of Karlowitz, the first treaty the Ottomans ever signed with other European powers that was concluded on their terms rather than on the Ottomans’ terms. If you look carefully enough at the 1664 Battle of Saint Gotthard, the final clash of the 1663-1664 Ottoman-Austrian War, you can see some of the seeds of those coming Ottoman defeats. Saint Gotthard itself was, in fact, an Ottoman defeat, but it came tacked on to the end of a war the Ottomans had already won (though not in the way or to the degree they’d intended to win it), and it led to a peace treaty that continued, albeit not for very much longer, the Ottoman streak of concluding only favorable treaties with their European rivals.

That 1663-64 war was born out of an Ottoman desire to resume the empire’s inexorable expansion west, to Vienna and beyond into central Europe. It began, innocuously enough, with a wayward Ottoman vassal, Prince George II Rákóczi of Transylvania (d. 1660), who decided to up and invade Poland in 1657 without consulting with the Sublime Porte (the Ottomans used this euphemism to refer to the royal court, per the practice of issuing edicts via the palace’s main gate or, in this case, “sublime porte”–I don’t think I’ve ever used it before here, but, in my defense, it’s a pretty goofy euphemism). The Ottomans, ruled by Sultan Mehmed IV (d. 1693, though he was deposed in 1687) and his Grand Vizier, Köprülü Fazıl Ahmed Pasha (d. 1676), at first simply ordered Rákóczi deposed, but when that didn’t take they opted to invade Transylvania to teach their vassals the cost of going to war without permission. And so in 1660 they invaded Transylvania, killed Rákóczi, and ultimately annexed the territory to the empire instead of leaving it as a semi-autonomous vassal.

Map - Ottomans in 16th & 17th Centuries
Although this map doesn’t really have much to do with the war or the battle we’re talking about here, it at least helps to put these places in a geographic context

Before the Porte decided to annex Transylvania, though, they replaced Rákóczi with their own candidate for the throne, but the Transylvanian nobles rejected him and elected John Kemény (d. 1662) instead. It was at this point that the Ottomans returned, intent on annexation, and Kemény high-tailed it out of there and over to the court of Austrian Archduke, King of Hungary, and Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I (d. 1705). Leopold was dismayed at the idea of Transylvanian being absorbed into the Ottoman Empire and so he agreed to back Kemény’s bid to reacquire his throne. He sent one of his top generals, Raimondo Montecuccoli (d. 1680), to Transylvania, but he didn’t send him with very much in the way of actual forces, so Montecuccoli couldn’t really do much but inconvenience the Ottomans and watch as they completed the conquest of Transylvania. However, this intervention was deemed by the Ottomans, who were looking for an excuse to start a new war with the Habsburgs anyway, as a cassus belli, and everybody started preparing for war.

In mid-1663 Ahmed Köprülü led an army of perhaps as large as 150,000 men into Habsburg Hungary, and Montecuccoli, again hopelessly outnumbered (he had less than 30,000 under his command), could only watch as they captured the city of Érsekújvár (modern Nové Zámky, in Slovakia). Leopold scrambled to raise a pan-European army to reinforce his own troops, and succeeded in roughly doubling the number of men he had to send against the Ottomans. Early the following year, a contingent of Hungarian troops under Miklós Zrínyi (d. 1664 NOT A SPOILER) destroyed a bridge in what is now eastern Croatia that was important to the Ottoman supply lines, but the Ottomans responded that summer by besieging and capturing Zrínyi’s own castle.

The capture of his castle took Zrínyi’s men out of the fight, but the siege also gave Montecuccoli more time to prepare for the inevitable Ottoman march toward Vienna. He was able to cobble together an army somewhere between 30,000 and 40,000 men strong and meet the Ottomans at Saint Gotthard, a monastery near the point where the Ottomans crossed the Rába River. Though Leopold’s forces, having been drawn from all over the German states and France, were naturally plagued by infighting among their leaders, Montecuccoli was able to convince everybody to attempt one united charge at the Ottoman army just after it had crossed the river. Although they were heavily outnumbered, the massed charge was enough to panic the Ottomans and send them scrambling back over the river in disarray, resulting in many drowning deaths.

Saint Gotthard stopped the Ottoman push west entirely. The battle inflicted heavy casualties on Köprülü’s Janissaries, which meant he was left with a mostly conscript/part-time army that would never have survived the march to Vienna much less have been able to successfully besiege it. However, when momentum seemed to be with the Austrians, Leopold opted to call it a day rather than press his luck by, say, trying to conquer Hungary from the Ottomans. The momentary unity that Montecuccoli had been able to instill among his forces couldn’t possibly last, and any attempt to reverse Ottoman gains would undoubtedly provoke a response from the Ottomans that the Austrians might not be able to withstand. Moreover, Leopold had bigger fish to fry to the West; the Spanish Habsburg line was on the brink of dying out whenever the childless Charles II died, and Leopold could see that the issue of this Spanish Succession was very likely to provoke a War between the Austrian Habsburgs and Louis XIV of France. I wonder how that all shook out.

Well, anyway, as a result, in the subsequent Peace of Vasvár the Habsburgs agreed to acknowledge Ottoman possession of Transylvania and Érsekújvár and got, really, nothing in return except peace–the Ottomans agreed to pay a small tribute to the Habsburgs annually, but the Habsburgs agreed to do the same thing to the Ottomans, so it evened out. The treaty was seen as ridiculously, offensively even, lopsided by Hungarian and Croatian leaders, who were angered by Leopold’s unwillingness to press east and try to recover some of the territory the Ottomans had taken from them over the years, and in particular by the aforementioned Miklós Zrínyi, who was furious that the Habsburgs never came to the aid of his besieged castle. This led to the “Magnate Conspiracy,” an attempt by those leaders to overthrow the Habsburgs and become independent. The conspiracy never got off the ground–in part because Mehmed ratted the plot’s leaders out to Leopold after they approached the Ottomans for assistance–and in fact it allowed the Habsburgs to consolidate their control over Croatia and Hungary in its aftermath.

Now, although the treaty ended up being concluded largely in Ottoman favor, in hindsight it does seem that the Ottomans may have benefited from Leopold’s preoccupation with events to the west and from the disunity of the Austrian/Allied troops. Had Leopold allowed Montecuccoli to pursue the retreating Ottomans back east, and had Montecuccoli been able to keep his forces together, we could be talking about Vasvár, or wherever in that case, the way we talk about Karlowitz. Again, this is helped a lot by hindsight, but the outcome at Saint Gotthard shows that whatever gap had once existed between the Ottoman military and the rest of Europe was closing.

TIP JAR

Author: DWD

writer, blogger, lover, fighter

2 thoughts

  1. I love your little asides. The War of the Spanish Succession has vexed undergrads since the beginning of time (1947).

Leave a Reply