Happy Nowruz to anyone who is celebrating today. My appreciation for spring is being tempered by the eight inches of … Continue reading World update: March 20 2018
SYRIA One addendum to yesterday’s update. When I cited the New York Times on estimates of Russian casualties in last week’s … Continue reading Middle East update: February 14 2018
THE TERRORISM COLA WARS Al-Qaeda, or at least individual al-Qaeda branches, are reportedly trying to take advantage of ISIS’s misfortunes … Continue reading World update: January 19 2018
Skipping yesterday was probably a bad idea. There’s plenty here for a two-parter, so as I’ve done before I’m going to put all the Middle Eastern stuff in a separate post.
320 MILLION FOOLS AND OUR MONEY
The F-35 is the most expensive weapon (well, it’s intended to be a weapon, anyway) ever manufactured, with an estimated total cost upwards of $1.5 trillion over the next half-century. For that expense, much of which has already been paid–and could have been put toward healthcare, schools, aid to the poorest of the poor, repairing infrastructure, improving cyber defenses, or any of countless other things that are more important than the F-35–what we’ve purchased is an aircraft that is supposed to do a lot of different things and in reality is terrible at almost all of them:
The F-35 still has a long way to go before it will be ready for combat. That was the parting message of Michael Gilmore, the now-retired Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, in his last annual report.
The Joint Strike Fighter Program has already consumed more than $100 billion and nearly 25 years. Just to finish the basic development phase will require at least an extra $1 billion and two more years. Even with this massive investment of time and money, Gilmore told Congress, the Pentagon and the public, “the operational suitability of all variants continues to be less than desired by the Services.”
Gilmore detailed a range of remaining and sometimes worsening problems with the program, including hundreds of critical performance deficiencies and maintenance problems. He also raised serious questions about whether the Air Force’s F-35A can succeed in either air-to-air or air-to-ground missions, whether the Marine Corps’ F-35B can conduct even rudimentary close air support, and whether the Navy’s F-35C is suitable to operate from aircraft carriers.
He found, in fact, that “if used in combat, the F-35 aircraft will need support to locate and avoid modern threat ground radars, acquire targets, and engage formations of enemy fighter aircraft due to unresolved performance deficiencies and limited weapons carriage availability.”
On the plus side, it doesn’t suffocate its pilots anymore. Probably.
The F-35, to me, is the sign that we Americans are never going to actually stand up and take action to put our government back in its place. This is a weapon whose value would be questionable if it worked, but it doesn’t even work, at all, and yet we’re shoveling hundreds of billions of dollars at Lockheed-Martin to keep making it. Why? Because Lockheed-Martin knows what levers to pull in Washington. This is money literally being stolen from the vast majority of us and handed to a defense contractor in exchange for something that doesn’t work and most likely never will work because its very design is flawed. If $1.5 trillion flushed down the toilet–while our government tells people who can’t afford health insurance and children who don’t get enough to eat to go fuck themselves–isn’t enough to enrage us, then nothing ever will be.
Michael Flynn, who may be nibbling on a block of Gouda right now for all I know, says he’s ready to
rat out Donald Trump testify about Russiaghazigate to Congress but he wants immunity from prosecution beforehand. This suggests that he knows he did something illegal, and the reason I say that is because in 2016 one Michael Flynn told me that anybody who gets immunity probably committed a crime. Unfortunately for Flynn, he’s apparently been shopping this immunity deal around–to the FBI, for example–and so far nobody wants to take him up on it, including (at this point) the Senate. That suggests, and I’m sorry to be Debbie Downer for the Trump-to-Leavenworth folks, that Flynn isn’t really offering anything that investigators want badly enough to forego the chance to prosecute him.
GOOD FOR THE GOOSE
We’ve always been at war with Eastasia in Afghanistan. Well, OK, it only seems like we have. But that’s not … Continue reading Never-ending war is officially never going to end
This needs a preface. I try very hard to be culturally sensitive, something I hope is clear from reading this blog. Yes, I like to have some fun, and frequently get outraged, at the antics of societies and governments in other parts of the world and at different points in history, but certainly no more (and, as far as outrage is concerned, much less) than I do with respect to my own government and society in the present day. My general lefty political outlook and my training as a historian either lead me to this position or are themselves informed by it; I’m not sure which way the correlation works. But I want to be clear that I think respecting other cultures is generally a good thing, and that’s especially true when you’re trying to endear your country to an entire nation of people. So I would agree, for example, that US military and civilian personnel in Afghanistan need to be cognizant of the culture there and work very hard to avoid causing offense.
Now, that said, what the hell is going on here?
Rampant sexual abuse of children has long been a problem in Afghanistan, particularly among armed commanders who dominate much of the rural landscape and can bully the population. The practice is called bacha bazi, literally “boy play,” and American soldiers and Marines have been instructed not to intervene — in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records.
The policy has endured as American forces have recruited and organized Afghan militias to help hold territory against the Taliban. But soldiers and Marines have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the American military was arming them in some cases and placing them as the commanders of villages — and doing little when they began abusing children.
The American policy of nonintervention is intended to maintain good relations with the Afghan police and militia units the United States has trained to fight the Taliban. It also reflects a reluctance to impose cultural values in a country where pederasty is rife, particularly among powerful men, for whom being surrounded by young teenagers can be a mark of social status.
There’s cultural sensitivity, and then there’s aiding and abetting atrocity. This is the latter. The Pentagon and the White House assure us that there’s no policy in place requiring US service members to ignore allegations of sexual misconduct by our Afghan partners. I suppose that makes liars of the service members whose careers have suffered because they tried to do something to stop these abuses from taking place, or the Marine lance corporal who was killed by an Afghan boy who may have been driven to pick up a weapon and start shooting people by the abuse to which he had personally been subjected.
I realize that Rick Wiles is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, nor is he above, let’s say, some … Continue reading How do they fight in those pumps?